27
HETEROSEXUAL OFFENDERS VS. MINORS: HETEROSEXUAL PETTING
27 March 2009
by
admin
Filed under
Men's Health-Erectile Dysfunction
While the heterosexual offenders vs. minors did not have much to do with girls before adolescence, by ages sixteen to seventeen they had remedied this situation and had more female companions than most sex offenders. Half of them reported numerous girl companions, the third highest percentage, but 18 per cent reported none: in summary, this places them just below the control group but above most of the sex offenders in a rank-order measuring female companionship.-
This measure of social success is reflected in their petting experience. A relatively large number (97 per cent, fourth in rank-order) were petting between ages sixteen and twenty. Moreover, they petted with numerous girls, 26 per cent reporting over 100 partners, a figure exceeded only by the offenders vs. adults and by the prison group, and far surpassing the control group.
In accumulative incidence, the proportion who had petted by a specified age, the offenders vs. minors exhibit moderate figures: by age twelve two fifths had petted, by age fourteen slightly more than half, and by ages sixteen and eighteen 79 per cent and 90 per cent respectively.
The accumulative incidence of reaching orgasm by petting remained at moderate levels until age twenty-six, when these offenders rank third with almost 40 per cent thus experienced; by age thirty slightly over half had reached orgasm in petting.
The heterosexual offenders vs. minors reached orgasm in premarital petting more often than most others. The average (mean) frequency among those who experienced this form of outlet, was from once a month to twice a month, which suffices to make them rank second in age-period puberty-15, fourth in age-period 16-20, and second again in age-period 21-25. This tendency toward relatively high frequencies is less evident when one calculates the median frequency (about 4 per year), yet even in this measurement they ultimately achieve first place in age-period 21—25. Perhaps these high frequencies of petting to orgasm are associated with the high frequencies of premarital coitus.
The age-specific incidence figures for reaching orgasm by petting are moderate until age-period 26-30, when these offenders rise to third rank with about one fifth of their members being involved, and in the following age-period, 31-35, they attain first rank with one third—a figure slightly above that of the control group. This high incidence is in keeping with the high frequency figures just mentioned.
While nearly all had experienced heterosexual genital manipulation (96 per cent, a relatively high figure), they were usually averse to mouth-genital contact. Only 12 per cent had ever placed their mouths on female genitalia, either before, during, or after marriage; this restraint exceeds that of both the control group (22 per cent) and prison group (27 per cent). Those who did so tended to have done so before marriage and to have avoided such contact with their wives. While males are more inclined to accept mouth-genital contact upon themselves than to perform it upon their partners, the offenders vs. minors remain consistent in their inhibition toward mouth-genital contact of either kind. About one third (the second smallest percentage recorded) had never had a female put her mouth to their genitalia. In this respect they are not unlike the control group (37 per cent) but are unlike the prison group (52 per cent). Once again they avoided such activity with their wives. The few who had experienced fellation had done so primarily with prostitutes—some 32 per cent, which is a comparatively low percentage. Lower percentages are recorded only for the incest offenders vs. adults (an especially inhibited group) and the heterosexual offenders vs. adults.
This general avoidance of mouth-genital contact is also to be found among the heterosexual offenders vs. adults, and may be in part associated with the educational level of these two groups. We know that mouth-genital contact is more taboo at lower socioeconomic and educational levels, and the heterosexual offenders in our sample tend to be less educated than other groups. Furthermore, the great majority of our sample of offenders vs. minors and adults came from an Indiana prison knd had a more rural background than most other sex-offense groups.
There is reason to believe that the heterosexual offenders against, females aged twelve and older eschew sophisticated, elaborate, or unusual sexual techniques. One might say that they are not interested in the “frills” of sex. In addition to their avoidance of mouth-genital contact, they also avoid nibbling and biting the sexual partner’s body which is so common among other mammals. Seventy-nine per cent had never used this technique, a percentage exceeded only—and significantly—by the offenders vs. adults.
*49\161\2*
